Boeing’s Courses of Action and Ethical Frameworks
After this crisis, Boeing’s primary objective should be to regain trust in every stakeholder; airlines, governments and passengers need to be assured that the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft they are flying are safe. Furthermore, passengers need to know that Boeing’s highest priority is safety and that pilots are fully prepared to deal with the new aircraft.

With the battering of their reputation, Boeing will not have an easy path forward. CEO of Boeing, Dennis Muilenburg, gave an address to the world detailing the preliminary reports that the MCAS system were a primary factor in both crashes. Now, it is imperative that Boeing partner with their stakeholders to develop a path forward for the re-introduction of the 737 MAX to service. Following a teleological approach, Boeing has moral obligation to do what is “right”. I believe this framework gives the best path forward with honoring the lives lost of the two disasters and works to protect the future.
Why this Approach is the Best
The Teleological approach reins supreme in defining a path forward for Boeing for a multitude of reasons. Boeing needs to implement a utilitarian approach for their 737 MAX crisis as they are responsible for the lives of anyone who steps on their aircraft. Though this approach will cost stakeholders such as airlines and airports a lot of money in dealing with the 737 MAX grounding, it is superior to having the possibility of an accident.
Other Potential Approaches for Boeing
Boeing could consider utilizing a deontological approach as it is their “duty” to quickly fix the 737 MAX and safely return it to service. Immanuel Kant’s argument to act with one’s “duty” provides for a less clear path forward as the corporation’s duty is to maximize shareholder returns, not necessarily in the best interest of the consumer. This is a possible alternative approach, but not the best one as Boeing needs to put safety, not profits first. With the rush to market of the 737 MAX and extra cost for more safety features to compensate for the MCAS system, Boeing has been shown to prioritize profits over people. For Boeing, there is a long flight ahead.
References
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/07/politics/boeing-aviation-737-max-aftereffects/index.html
https://liveandletsfly.boardingarea.com/2019/03/11/boeing-737-max-8-safety-statement/
I definitely agree that a utilitarian approach is necessary. Boeing needs to regain everyone’s trust and making everyone happy is a great way to do that.
LikeLike
Absolutely. The earning and retention of trust from the public is vital to the future of Boeing. This will be earned through actions that showcase a focus on safe and ethical decision making throughout the design, testing, introduction, operation and service of their jets.
LikeLike
I wonder if Boeing will ever be able to fully recover from this situation. Looking forward, I agree with your statement that Boeing needs to regain trust from their flyers/pilots, but I’m not sure if people will ever forget about the almost 400 casualties. We shall wait and see what happens!
LikeLike
Boeing will have to navigate in a world with less trust and confidence in their company and products for a long time. To recover from a scandal of this magnitude is possible, but not a simple process.
LikeLike
I sure hope their approach is utilitarian. So many families affected by these crashes it’s heartbreaking. The company needs to put safety and customer service before profits and bottom lines from here on out.
LikeLike
Absolutely. People before profits is key. These irrevocable loss of life is extremely heartbreaking, but steps can be taken to ensure this doesn’t happen in the future.
LikeLike
I agree with that and feel its honest. their reputation was certainly tainted from this unfortunate event but over time and principles they discussed they can work to regain the trust of its customers and by the people flying on their planes.
LikeLike
Absolutely. Boeing’s work is cut out for them to restore their reputation, but it is certainly within the realm of possibility.
LikeLike